Oswald Vs. The Braineaters

Music, Design, and Apparel
contentTop

Oswald Vs. The Braineaters

Before I launch into my whole schpiel here and start foaming at the mouth, let me say one thing: I don’t hate zombies. As a younger man, I hated many things, but now that I’ve grown up and mellowed out, I try to save emotions of that intensity for truly deserving targets (like Sarah Palin). But I do have a zombie problem: I don’t “get” the appeal. Zombies are slow, dim-witted creatures whose only reason for continued existence is their hunger for brains. I decided to address this topic at length here for two reasons: 1) People love zombies; over the past decade, more books, movies, and songs have been devoted to zombies than any other monster. Their popularity has already gone through the proverbial roof, exited the Earth’s stratosphere, and lifted God’s skirt in Heaven. Zombies are huge. 2) I’m a world famous internet blogger, and people want to know what I think about absolutely everything.

Now: in the interest of fairness, I’ve invited our friends at two separate zombie t-shirt companies to represent a pro-zombie stance. I suckered them into doing this by asking if they would answer “a few general questions about zombie culture” and then springing hyper-specific zombie vs. vampire hypotheticals on them. This is called “getting a scoop.” The fine fellows in question are Django from ShopZombie and Jason from Zombie Liquorice, and I strongly urge you to check out their sites and spend some cash – we may not see eye-to-eye about the undead, but they both have some very fine merchandise that will make your wiener tingle in a most pleasant fashion. But before we hear from them, I’mma let myself finish explaining why I don’t like zombies.

First, there’s the “slow and stupid” factor. Zombies are dumb, lumbering beasts; the average zombie moves slower than Jason Vorhees on ‘Ludes. I’ve been a dedicated pack-a-day smoker for just under a decade; when we ran the mile in high school, I never finished in less than fifteen minutes. But even I, Oswald Fucking Hobbes, could out-run a zombie. I could probably also overpower one in a fight, despite whatever enhanced strength he might possess, because I’m a nimble ninja where it counts: in my mind. I would confuse the shit out of a zombie. Also: zombies are undead. That means they’ve already been killed once, most likely by a zombie. So: if you’re dumb enough to be killed by a zombie (which we’ve already established would make you pretty fucking dumb), and you then become a zombie (which kills another couple thousand brain cells), are you really gonna argue that you stand a chance against a super-genius such as myself? I don’t think so, cabron. But my biggest problem with zombies is their utter lack of personality. If I find myself in a fight to the death, I want to face a combatant with some spark, somebody that can trade witty one-liners with me and get personally invested in the outcome of the battle. We’ve already established I can out-run and out-think a zombie; the only thing that might convince me to stay and fight would be a compelling, charismatic persona, which is something that zombies simply cannot offer.

Those are the reasons I don’t fear zombies. Take those reasons and multiply them by a thousand and you’ll understand why I won’t spend two hours watching a movie about zombies. I don’t need entertainment to try and make boring things interesting;  I want entertainment featuring subject matter that’s already entertaining. I’m too busy being world-famous to watch movies about boring crap that wouldn’t scare me in real life. This may seem like a stupid argument to you, but your face seems stupid to me. So let’s call it a draw and hear from some real zombie experts, who will provide us with information that is interesting but, unfortunately, factually incorrect. I’ll point out the inconsistencies in italics when need be.

What is it about zombies that people find so appealing?

"I Love Brains" tee from Shop Zombie

Django: Pirates, zombies, bacon, Pet Rocks… All of these things have tugged the collective coattail of consumers at some point. It’s always a mystery to me how these things rise in popularity. I think that a pile of good, exciting zombie movies (28 Days Later, Dawn of the Dead remake, etc) catapulted zombies into the modern public’s eye.

Jason: I cannot speak for everyone, but what makes zombies so appealing to me is they are very anti-hero.  They will never be featured in a shitty teenage love drama and will never be romanticized.  They are incorruptible and never disappoint.  If you love horror or gore, you must love zombies. (Well, that’s not true, and I can disprove it easily: I love horror AND gore, and zombies do absolutely nothing for me.)

Zombies seem incredibly easy to defeat. Am I wrong about this? If so, why?

Django: Somehow, it seems that only the stupidest people survive the initial zombie attacks. The hardest part about defeating zombies is that they have sheer numbers, and if they can get close to you, you’re suddenly in a VERY dangerous situation. (I believe I already refuted this pretty satisfactorily above. But, in regards to numbers, so what? The zombies aren’t able to organize themselves in any way, so they’d just be stumbling around like a bunch of drunken hobos.)

Jason: Zombies can seem incredibly easy to defeat.  This is their strength.  What they lack in defensive awareness they more than make up for in aggressive numbers.  Not to mention the fact that their numbers keep replenishing after every fresh kill, bite or even scratch. (So you’re telling me that zombies’ obvious stupidity and clumsiness comprise some kind of secret strength? That’s blatant nonsense. See above for my thoughts about zombies’ strength in numbers…or lack thereof.)

Honestly, in a zombie vs. vampire fight (fair), who would win? What if the fight wasn’t governed by traditional codes of honor?

Django: Well, if the vampire was dumb enough to bite the zombie, it would turn INTO a zombie, right? So I dunno. Does that count as a win for the zombie? (No. Vampires aren’t dumb – this isn’t some Team Edward shit, I’m talkin’ Bram Stoker style. Dracula wouldn’t bite a zombie, he’d use his super strength to snap that motherfucker in half.)

"Twilight" by Zombie Liquorice

Jason: We actually did a shirt based on this age-old battle.  The Zombie will always win, mainly because he is not thinking about high school girls or when the sun is about to rise.  More often than not, the zombie is only interested in one thing: brains.  That, coupled with his inability to feel any pain and the fact that he is undead, really ensures victory.  Not to mention that there is probably a horde of zombies just around the corner waiting to mop up whatever is left.  For this very reason there could never be a fair zombie vs. vampire fight – no code of honor could ever be enforced. The ref would promptly be eaten as well unfortunately. (Jason brings up some interesting points, but fails to play by the rules of the hypothetical and thus voids his own answers. One zombie, one vampire. If a zombie needs an entire horde of his undead buddies to come and get his back, he’s not fit to even get in the ring.)

If zombies eat so much brain, why don’t they ever get smarter? Brain seems like the textbook definition of “brain food.”

Django: Same reason that eating carrots doesn’t turn you into a carrot. (That would be a valid point if I had asked why zombies don’t turn into brains. Nice try. I eat carrots because they taste good and they improve my vision. I assume that zombies have a similar reason for feasting exclusively on human brains, and I doubt it’s the taste.)

Jason: Let me explain it this way: “I eat really lean, muscular meat, but I am still fat… What gives?”  You see what I did there – clever, eh? (Yeah, about as clever as a zombie attempting algebra. If you just ate lean, muscular meat – if that was literally the ONLY thing in your diet – you probably wouldn’t be fat. And since zombies eat nothing but brains, they shouldn’t be so stupid. Who’s clever now, Jason?)

Vampires were the ultimate monsters for ages, mostly due to the wealth of artistically legitimate movies and books devoted to them. Is it possible that zombies’ cultural cachet will recede in the future if somebody like Stephanie Meyers writes a teen romance novel featuring a really sensitive zombie who refuses to eat brains, thus sparking a trend of emasculated zombies in popular culture? Would this make you angry?

Django: If someone tried this shit right now, there would be gigantic backlash against them. It would be a massive fail. It would be hard to pull this off. Vampires really have no down side. They can’t go out in the sunlight, sure, but they don’t age, they’re strong, they’re sexy. Zombies are rotting. They eat brains. They are dumb as hell. You’d have to bastardize zombies pretty good before they appealed to young girls. (“Zombies are rotting. They eat brains. They are dumb as hell.” This is the guy DEFENDING zombies, ladies and gentlemen. I must say, though, I agree on all counts. This makes me wonder if I don’t like zombies because I am, in fact, a young girl.)

Official Assault Zombie T-Shirt

Jason: Would this make me angry? Not so much anger, but more white hot loathing.  However, I know this will never happen, as I have already said that what makes zombies so cool is that they must all act a certain way to be classified as zombies.  If someone ever tried to break this mold or screw around with how zombies operate, the amount of book burnings that would take place would put another, bigger hole in the ozone. And no one wants that, right?  Zombies are here to stay; now lets just learn to love it. (I’m sure people felt the same way about vampires before Anne Rice and that crazy Mormon were so successful at making them seem sensitive. Not only do I refuse to love your precious zombies, I’m now actively rooting for someone to ruin their appeal by pussifying every even mildly cool thing about them.)

So, there you have it. This study effectively concludes that zombies are lame, vampires are better, and I am (obviously) best. I’d like to thank Jason and Django again for participating in my little study, and if you don’t go buy some product from them (here and here) you’re gonna have a zombie Oswald Hobbes at your door demanding fresh skullmeat. So get out your credit card, and check out our very own store here at Assault where we feature a pretty rad zombie shirt. And if anybody wants to collaborate on a film script about sensitive zombies, email me at oswald@assaultinc.com. I’ve got a lot of good ideas.

Like this post? Bookmark it!

Delicious Stumbleupon Facebook Twitter Design Float MySpace

Email to a friend

Privacy: We won't save or reuse these emails.

Your message has been sent!

Please enter a valid email.

Your email failed. Try again later.

About the Author

Oswald Hobbes Oswald Hobbes is an amateur music appreciationist from the wilds of the Midwest. Follow me on twitter
Email this Author | All posts by Oswald Hobbes

15 comments “awaiting immediate, obnoxious rebuttal”

  1. Jere says:

    I’ll be the first to say that zombies aren’t actually scary – but they sure as hell can be entertaining. They’re a horde that doesn’t have anything on their minds but feeding (though the zombie movies I love generally see them are carnivores who’ll eat anything human – brains are specifically a Return of the Living Dead thing). They have no remorse and will just kill. The fact that the condition spreads means that *a* zombie is easy to avoid, but it gets increasingly difficult as the numbers spread. Just a single hospital can be a source of hundreds of zombies; symptoms of sickness or broken bones won’t stop them. They’ll just drag on with what they’ve got until they find a food source.

    There’s also something sympathetic about them, as friends and family can become zombies after being “infected.” There is your personality: it’s the signs of their past lives, whether it’s a hard hat, a baseball bat dragging on the ground, a band shirt. There’s something vaguely tragic about zombies in that they are former human beings, robbed of their lives and personalities and left a hollow shell. It looks like your friend (more or less). and it walks as though it were a live, but nothing else about it is familiar.

    Similarly – the rules for killing a zombie (via the Romero “___ of the Dead” series, generally considered canon): you gotta destroy the brain or separate the head from the skull (and don’t get me started on the Return of the Living Dead zombies – those just. do. not. stop.). For a zombie a few weeks old, this isn’t so hard. But the human skull is still pretty hard; your baseball bat is going to wear down; a gun will run out of ammo; a blade will wear thin. At any rate, there are always going to be more – there’s always another neighborhood that thinks it’s safe until one asshole doesn’t block a window, or a school that doesn’t know what’s going on. The odds are in their favor, and there’s almost never a zombie movie that ends with more than a handful of survivors.

    Can you run the landscape forever, taking food from convenience stores as you avoid the roving bands of creatures? Think you can barricade yourself in a safe place? Imagine thousands of dead hands pressing up against the doors and windows. Build a wall? That’ll work for awhile, but eventually they’ll gather the numbers that some are just climbing over one another until you’re back to having them at your door. Separated by a body of water? They dont’ need to breathe – they’ll just walk the ocean. Can your supplies last you forever? Of course, they’re stoppable , but can you ward off the population of the world, turned into remorseless killing beasts, on your own? These are the considerations within the zombie genre.

    As for zombie movies as movies, they can (and often do) provide good cultural satire, as in the original Dawn of the Dead. A lot of them turn into parables about the deceitfulness within mankind’s nature. I’ll agree to an extent that they are inherently lame monsters in many ways, which is why Zombieland, Dead Alive and Shaun of the Dead are effective comedies. But they’re still good for entertainments, as even the super-low budget Night of the Living Dead has an imminent sense of danger.

    But, all that aside, if you were to argue that it’s a played-out meme that really needs to stop so that we can start over again with some good zombie movies in 20 years – I will agree with that.

  2. Jere says:

    Also, I alluded to this, but while what you get from George Romero’s series is generally considered “standard” zombies, film makers and writers have been able to play with many variables for years (the “fast/slow” debate, there have been smart zombies, zombies that learn over time, how to kill them, etc.). It offers more flexibility than, say, werewolves or vampires*.

    *-”Twilight” does not count as vampire flexibility.

  3. tim says:

    The only zombie movies where the zombies were scary was 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later. I thought the rest of them were supposed to be comedies?

  4. Josh says:

    The debate between which apocalyptic scenario would be more survivable — Nuclear Holocaust or Zombie Invasion — yours truly knocked it out of the park as I could easily survive a zombie takeover.

    (It was somewhere over at FSR but the fucking site is down right now, hence no link)

  5. Newman says:

    I would like to see more zombie animals.

  6. Newman says:

    Why are humans the lucky targets anyway, off all the brains they have to be people brains, I call foul.
    Also why can’t zombies just eat themselves? and can they eat ugly people please and leave the clumsy big boob’ed cheerleaders alone.

  7. tim says:

    Why dont’ they eat each other? Does it have to be living flesh and brains?

  8. Newman says:

    Yeah that’s what I was getting at. If they would just eat themselves then I’m sure people and zombies could co exist. I like chicken and beef but I don’t like chicken and cow brains, the zombies are welcome to that part.
    oh Are the un-dead, infected, and zombies the same thing?

  9. Cane says:

    How come zombies do not eat other zombies? I mean they still have some brains left, so come they only eat a living human brain and not zombie brain. Also, how come zombies do not eat animals?

    These things have always puzzled me. Any takes?

  10. Well, here’s the thing. Zombies aren’t real. If they were real, they most definitely would eat animals, other zombies, and probably lamps as well. Anything they could bite into, they’d be chompin.’ But since they aren’t real, and they’re just in scary movies, they’re portrayed as eating only live humans with fresh brains. Because that’s considered scary, even though it’s not.

  11. tim says:

    Dude according to Max Brooks there were real documented zombie outbreaks of all kinds. They’re in the book. I have the book and the illustrations if you want to see.

  12. Dallas Hopkins says:

    Dear Mr. Hobbes, Excellent article, very well written I must say. Well written indeed. Except. Why someone as educated as yourself, (or at least you sound), must you rely on such coarse language? That, and the obvious disdain you show towards Sarah Palin. I realize that this is not the main topic of your article, but that one line in particular, really jumped out at me. I find her to be a very articulate individual, just as you are. I’ve always found her to be a no nonsense, common sense individual, wanting everyone to succeed, and to be the very best they can. For that demeanor, I never could quit understand the Hatred directed towards this woman. She is after all someone’s Mother, 5 times over. No one’s Mother should be treated like that! Should they? That, and being one Attractive Lady, she is real pleasure to look at, and admire. Is there some reason that you should feel threatened by her? Are you threatened by her? I shall close for now, do not wish to ramble on in this public forum. Once again, a great article Mr. Hobbes, I anxiously look forward to your next contribution. Sincerely,
    Dallas Hopkins

  13. tim says:

    No nonsense? I think you’ve forgotten about that whole, “I can see Russia from Alaska” thing–or maybe her lying about her involvement with the bridge to nowhere.

    Common sense? Come on, she tried to get her 18 year old to marry her baby daddy. She believes in abstinence only education… don’t even get me started.

    So what you seem to be saying is, because she is an, “Attractive Lady,” with a capital ‘a’ no less, that she is therefore exempt from criticism and parody?

  14. tim says:

    I’m willing to bet that you’re a firm believer in the earth only being 6,000 years old too right? Jesus rode dinosaurs?

  15. http://www.zombiewalkolympia.com/ Check these local WA Zomies out. They have 2nd summer walk in July and did great (first eer) ZomProm in Nov. in Olympia WA.

Footer
  • Recent Comments

    • Trap Nigga: haha gucci my nigga though
    • Oswald Hobbes: Totally fucking agree with this guy.
    • Norman Eppich: Yes, it is possible. When people suffer trauma as a child, their mind often blocks it out until they are old e...
    • tim: Sounds interesting. Party.
    • Jere: I kinda like the remasters of Dylan's stuff better than the original vinyls, or at least the vinyls I've got. ...
    • tim: You like Bare Naked Lady. They suck.
    • Josh Radde: If you're going to make fun of me for shitty bands I like, make sure you talk about bands I ACTUALLY like. ...
  • Newsletter

    Signup for our newsletter and you'll also get our best content, and a $5 gift card to use at our online store.
    (not valid with other offers/sales)




  • Rock Photos!

    direct_hit-0118 20100622-20100622-dsc_0031 dsc_0065 20100610-20100610-dsc_0007 dsc_0143 20100108-dsc_0060 dsc_0067 welcome-to-ashley-darkroom-chicago-0025 direct_hit-0105
Close Don't show again! Assault Shirts Online T-Shirt Store